![Carson City Weather Carson City Weather](https://carsonnow.org/sites/www.carsonnow.org/files/weather.jpg)
Opinion
Comment on Commentary from Supervisor Pete Livermore: “Let the people vote on the Nugget Project” by dhataway
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 6:31pmThe city does not necessarily need a new full size gym when one already exists.
Comment on Commentary from Supervisor Pete Livermore: “Let the people vote on the Nugget Project” by SeanLehmann
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 6:26pmAlthought I support the Nugget project, I agree with Pete on this one. The voters should have a say on where their money is spent.
Comment on Commentary from Supervisor Pete Livermore: “Let the people vote on the Nugget Project” by Dave Morgan
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 5:57pmIn response to dhataway: There is nothing wrong with trying to keep hope alive for an indoor recreation facility, but you are quite correct that based on the city’s current financial condition, ju
Comment on Commentary from Supervisor Pete Livermore: “Let the people vote on the Nugget Project” by deenol
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 5:25pmI am very much in favor of progress and it is very exciting to hear about this plan, however….I could not agree more with Mr.
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by dhataway
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 5:13pmIf it is determined that a new library is needed one of the options that could be considered is the construction of the facility at the northwest of corner of Musser and Stewart across from the Nev
Comment on Commentary from Supervisor Pete Livermore: “Let the people vote on the Nugget Project” by dhataway
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 5:00pmI find the comments of “Maddog” to be very interesting.
Comment on Parks and Rec Commissioner Sean Lehmann running for Supervisor Ward One by SeanLehmann
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 4:51pmThanks Tony!
Comment on Commentary from Supervisor Pete Livermore: “Let the people vote on the Nugget Project” by maddog
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 3:33pmThank goodness for Supervisor Livermore, the only member of the BOS to bring common sense to this issue.
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Dave Morgan
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 3:26pmI have read Fahrenheit 451. It was required reading in high school. However, when Mr. Bradbury wrote that classic story he had no idea that something like the internet was even possible.
Comment on Parks and Rec Commissioner Sean Lehmann running for Supervisor Ward One by Tony M
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 2:50pmGood luck Sean. I supported you for mayor last time around, and you can count on my support now!
Comment on Commentary from Supervisor Pete Livermore: “Let the people vote on the Nugget Project” by Joe Childs
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 2:36pmThank you Mr. Livermore for bringing some sanity to the table!
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Barbara Mathews
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 1:19pmMr. Morgan, I was not shutting down the debate. I was merely stating, walk into your public library. It might surprise you what you will discover there.
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Dave Morgan
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 1:02pmAnd thank you Ron for your comments.
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Ron Belbin
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 12:26pmOk…now you are talking about the specifics of the project instead making outlandish and uniformed sweeping statements.
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Dave Morgan
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 12:07pmBarbara, it’s statements like “get your money’s worth instead of trying to find your information on the internet” that shuts down dialog, instead of nurturing it.
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Dave Morgan
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 11:00amRon: Valid points. Valid points. I’m more concerned about making a $50 million investment in a library while not knowing “where” information management is headed.
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Barbara Mathews
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 10:54amI have been a Library Director for 23 years in Churchill County. Like Sara Jones, I, too, have been planning a new library for Fallon.
Comment on Parks and Rec Commissioner Sean Lehmann running for Supervisor Ward One by SeanLehmann
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 10:46amI always opposed the first 1/8 cent of sales tax to the V and T.
Comment on Parks and Rec Commissioner Sean Lehmann running for Supervisor Ward One by CaptainAlex
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 10:31amHow about a novel idea? Why not return the 1/8 cents tax to the taxpayers. Simply agree to not use it. The city government seems only interested in raising both taxes and spending.
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Ron Belbin
Submitted by on Wed, 02/03/2010 - 9:17amOkay…we find common ground in the understanding that all public works projects should come under the closest of scrutiny at any time, let alone now. But surely that scrutiny should be informed.
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Dave Morgan
Submitted by on Tue, 02/02/2010 - 4:39pmNo, not against existing libraries per se. Just how they’re used, by whom and the costs. Would rather the ones we have be upgraded than whole new complexes be built.
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Ron Belbin
Submitted by on Tue, 02/02/2010 - 3:47pmIn the interest of full disclosure, I am an avid reader, a book hoarder, a library employee, a graduate student in a Library and Information Science program (delivered almost exclusively online!),
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by Dave Morgan
Submitted by on Tue, 02/02/2010 - 11:27amWell written. Provocative! Thank you for your contribution to the debate!
Comment on Editorial: Why spend $50 million on the “last library?” by hamakiman
Submitted by on Tue, 02/02/2010 - 8:16amIn these days of financial constraint and economic hardship it is difficult at best for a community to pony up large sums of money for a project that won’t give you an immediate return on your mone
Comment on Obama budget: Bye Bye Yucca Mountain by Dave Morgan
Submitted by on Tue, 02/02/2010 - 8:10amYes Woodie, an honest question.
Comment on So Gibbons wants to lay off state workers? Well, it may get dicey… by Dave Morgan
Submitted by on Tue, 02/02/2010 - 7:57amWe’ve gotten some comments over the past 24 hours that were honest expressions of frustration and disappointment about how things are going in this country, and in Carson City.
Comment on So Gibbons wants to lay off state workers? Well, it may get dicey… by luvsnv
Submitted by on Mon, 02/01/2010 - 7:51pmMr. Hataway,
Comment on Capt. Bob White running for Sheriff by Ethics
Submitted by on Mon, 02/01/2010 - 6:20pmReally? are you kidding me. This man wants to be the next Sheriff of our town and he says “UM” 42 times and “YA KNOW” 29!!! Mr..
Comment on So Gibbons wants to lay off state workers? Well, it may get dicey… by Dave Morgan
Submitted by on Mon, 02/01/2010 - 6:01pmSome alternative ways of raising money. Nevada has a tax system that is far harder on low to middle class taxpayers than just about any state in the country.
Comment on So Gibbons wants to lay off state workers? Well, it may get dicey… by LVIEJO
Submitted by on Mon, 02/01/2010 - 12:39pmLook Nevadans the only way to relieve this burden is to raise taxes-plain and simple; laying off those who work is not the answer-that creates more stress Mr.Gibbons-I know this is NV but this is n
![RSS - Opinion Syndicate content](/misc/feed.png)